Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 24, 2026.
Public comments (5)
He argued the consultant has more to gain than the city, said the work could be done in-house, and urged that if the EIFD proceeds, aging sewers and public safety problems near the Cesar Chavez Foundation area get priority.
City Council - Jun 24, 2026 · 2:07:59 →He warned the EIFD is the redevelopment agency reborn, that 'acquisition' means eminent domain, and that boundary streets could expand citywide — telling council members they're handing opponents a campaign issue four months before re-election.
City Council - Jun 24, 2026 · 2:10:17 →He called the EIFD a backdoor to eminent domain, citing the city's past acquisition battles, and asked the city to call him and explain exactly what 'acquisition' means.
City Council - Jun 24, 2026 · 1:30:15 →She questioned why Washington and Beverly Boulevard taxes would rise 12-15% a decade before the train arrives, warned the increases would be passed to small business tenants and drive customers to big-box stores, and called it the new eminent domain.
City Council - Jun 24, 2026 · 2:13:03 →District 5 resident raised southside reputation and investment disparities, asked how the EIFD feasibility consultant was selected, and requested remote access for the Saturday train meeting.
City Council - Jun 10, 2026 · 2:19:26 →