O
Montebello
← Community
Taxes BudgetCommunity discussion

EIFD

Montebello

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (4)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 24, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedWill SeveroJun 24, 2026

He argued the consultant has more to gain than the city, said the work could be done in-house, and urged that if the EIFD proceeds, aging sewers and public safety problems near the Cesar Chavez Foundation area get priority.

City Council - Jun 24, 2026 · 2:07:59 →
OpposedLarry SalazarJun 24, 2026

He warned the EIFD is the redevelopment agency reborn, that 'acquisition' means eminent domain, and that boundary streets could expand citywide — telling council members they're handing opponents a campaign issue four months before re-election.

City Council - Jun 24, 2026 · 2:10:17 →
OpposedRay BrighairJun 24, 2026

He called the EIFD a backdoor to eminent domain, citing the city's past acquisition battles, and asked the city to call him and explain exactly what 'acquisition' means.

City Council - Jun 24, 2026 · 1:30:15 →
OpposedDenise AgopianJun 24, 2026

She questioned why Washington and Beverly Boulevard taxes would rise 12-15% a decade before the train arrives, warned the increases would be passed to small business tenants and drive customers to big-box stores, and called it the new eminent domain.

City Council - Jun 24, 2026 · 2:13:03 →
ConcernedCorey ChapelJun 10, 2026

District 5 resident raised southside reputation and investment disparities, asked how the EIFD feasibility consultant was selected, and requested remote access for the Saturday train meeting.

City Council - Jun 10, 2026 · 2:19:26 →